News & Comment
Local authority to introduce no smoking policy at playgrounds
Tuesday 8th November 2011, posted by forest
A council in England has introduced a no smoking policy at playgrounds and around its school gates.
Nottingham City Council council said it wanted to protect children from the effects of smoking and reduce its uptake. It added the policy was not enforceable by law, but wanted people to comply.
Smokers' group Forest (Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco) said the plans were "heavy handed".
Simon Clark, director of Forest, said: "It is not the business of a local council to tell adults how to behave. There is no evidence of a health risk to children from smoking in the open air."
No-smoking signs designed by children will be displayed in playgrounds maintained by Nottingham City Council. The signs will also be available for primary schools in the Nottingham city area to display at their school gates.
Source: BBC News (8 November 2011)
Comments:
Posted on Nov 9th, 2011
Posted on Nov 9th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
I'm not usually this severe with people but, oh, dear, this clown epitomises everything about tobacco control.
The man is a complete and very frightened idiot.
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Everyone now knows this, don't they?
Well don't they Colin?
Colin??
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
You really should learn how to evaluate what you see, read and hear, Colin, otherwise you are everybody's fool.
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
His woeful ignorance of reality is astonishing. Heaven help his children.
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
Posted on Nov 10th, 2011
There are 22 studies done into exposure to cigarette smoke and children. Three suggest a non statistically significant risk, eleven suggest non statistical protection, the remaining 7 are neither one way or the other. The most (in)famous is the 1998 World Health Organization's Professor Boffetta report and I quote:
''RESULTS: ETS exposure during childhood was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (odds ratio [OR] for ever exposure = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.96).''
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9776409
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
With there being no risk from second hand smoke outside, the council has no right to impose rules.
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
I really don't like being near people who don't wash their clothes or themselves. If you live in a major city your clothing and hair pick up odours from traffic fumes, dust from road surfaces and pollutants from the air. Within a day your clothes smell of city and your hair is full of little, black particles of soot. To those of us who do not live in cities you smell bad, I really notice it when I travel to a major city. Oh and people who want to run other peoples lives beat everyone else hands down for the title of "most inconsiderate people on Earth."
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
As for Colin......well what words can i use ?
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
These people are dangerous and need help before they harm others. They should be warned "Smokerphobia harms you and others around you."
Off course "nicola" and "colin" are from ASH of some other state scrounging anti-smoker quango. I know because offence is the language they use.
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
These people seem to hate washing and keeping themselves clean. And they say we stink - heh heh heh
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
Outside, the atmosphere is constantly moving. Air inside par boundaries moves out, and air outside the boundaries moves in. Thus, smoke of any kind which is outside a park moves into the park and smoke inside the park moves out of the park. So let us be clear - these nutty councillors are trying to ban smoking in constantly moving air. The reality is that the actual premises of the park are totally irrelevant.
So, Colin and Nicola, before you engage your mouth, why don't to engage your brains in advance? Like us, you should be appalled at the totalitarian nature of these edicts.
Posted on Nov 11th, 2011
They are putting up signs in the hope that people will believe that it is against the Law to smoke in the open air at a public place.
At least now that there have been challenges to the legality of these 'policies' the councils etc. are not trying to say that it is against the Law to smoke in the open air like they were a year or so again.
Perhaps the tide is turning against these nazi officials.
Posted on Nov 16th, 2011
Posted on Nov 16th, 2011
Posted on Dec 8th, 2011
Why not meet, get married and produce lots of little selfish-minded smokerphobics eh. Start their eduction really young and tell them, now children, there is a group of 12 MILLION people in this little land of ours and you can be as rude, nasty and vindictive as you like to them, because they are not like us, they are called smokers.
But, children, there are millions of others not like us in this little land, but whatever you do, you must NEVER be rude to them, because we embrace all races, creeds and genders and you mustnt ever show discrimination because it is uncalled for and unnecessary and will get you into much trouble, because people are people whatever their skin colour, beliefs gender or lifestyles.
Makes me puke - the hypocricy of the pillocks like you. Go look for a site which might interest you more. Perhaps you could start a new political party? Start eradicating the smokers, then perhaps the drinkers, then perhaps the fatties. Make sure only blonde haired blue eyed people can join. Ring any bells???????? You disgust me. Hitler tried to ban smoking in his early days. What more need I say.
Posted on Jan 28th, 2012
Non-smokers like you think your better than smokers. FALSE. It only shows the real you and attitude when it comes to people with different habits or that are different. Your the types that smile at people in the face and stab them in the back. THAT'S IGNORANT!!!!!
Thank you.



