News & Comment

New stats claim to show "shocking" cost of smoking in North East

Thursday 2nd February 2012, posted by forest

A report by a leading tobacco control group estimates that smoking costs the North East of England £210m a year.

The statistics from Fresh – in partnership with Brunel University – argue that smoking-related diseases cost the NHS in the region about £105m every year.

This includes £53m spent on more than 27,000 smoking-related hospital admissions each year alone. The remainder is the cost of outpatient appointments, GP consultations, prescription costs and nurse consultations.

Smoking is also estimated to cost employers in the North-East about £70m a year, with 335,000 days lost each year to absenteeism due to smoking, plus the cost of smoking breaks.

Passive smoking also costs the North-East about £35.9m a year, with the biggest burden falling on children exposed to secondhand smoke.S

Smoking, says Fresh, causes nearly 90 per cent of deaths from lung cancer, about 89 per cent from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and about 17 per cent from heart disease.

The research is disputed by smokers’ group Forest, which instead points to the contribution they make to the economy through taxes.

Simon Clark, director of Forest, said he was “very sceptical” about the figures.

“There is no hard evidence for this and smokers make a massive contribution to the economy.The tax that smokers pay far outweighs the alleged cost of treating smokingrelated disease and it is unfair to single out smokers who are often very valuable employees,” he said.

Source: Northern Echo (2 February 2012)

Comments:

Tony
Posted on
From my 50+ working years including management level, it was the non smokers who were always off sick, they seemed to have no immunity to bugs that were going round.
Though of course with this new dawn of smokers being forced out into the cold and wet, going from hot to cold I suppose the pendulum may have swung in the other direction, but I doubt it.
The cost of smoking breaks should never be factored in, as most employees are entitled to 5 mins an hour break, if they are standing all day or are staring at a computer screen, in the good days smokers would never take a break, whereas the non smokers were always slipping off.
We all know Hospital admission figures are what they want them to be .eg: Slipped on the ice leg broken went outside for a ciggy = smoking related.
Greg
Posted on
Very well said Tony. Smokers are MORE PRODUCTIVE than non-smokers. While the smokers are smoking, we also discuss working matters and fill out paperwork. We are also on-time when we have to return to our assigned positions. Where are the non-smokers? In the employee cafeteria feeding there faces,bitching about the smokers and are late for their assigned positions the majority of the time. I have observed this over the past few years.
The last words in your paragraph- "smoking related" should read, "Smoking BAN Related".
And lets face it. The majority of Non- Smokers ARE FOUL!!!!

Thank You.
Akanbi kaurdey ebrahym
Posted on
Good day,Sir/ma On behalf of d entire workers of d Forest Company,I will like 2 apply 4 a work as a computer Operator.Thanks
Greg
Posted on
Sorry Akanbi,
I don't think you would be able to get a job anywhere untill you start smoking to stimulate your brain cells into working order.
Leave a Reply



(Your email will not be publicly displayed.)

Please type the letters and numbers shown in the image.Captcha Code


Back to top

Recent posts

Share this page

Social Forest

Join the conversation online:



Friends of Forest