News & Comment

Plain packaging: tobacco giant to sue Australian government

Monday 21st November 2011, posted by forest

Philip Morris has launched legal action against the Australian government after parliament passed legislation banning all branding from cigarette packs.

The legislation, which takes effect in December 2012, bans the use of logos and brand imagery on cigarette packages, instead requiring that brand names be printed in a small, uniform font on dull olive green packets – a colour the government believes consumers will hate.

Philip Morris says that billions of dollars of valuable trademarks and investments in Australia are at stake.

"We are left with no option," Anne Edwards, a spokesman for Philip Morris Asia, said in a statement. "The government has passed this legislation despite being unable to demonstrate that it will be effective at reducing smoking and has ignored the widespread concerns raised in Australia and internationally regarding the serious legal issues associated with plain packaging."

Nicola Roxon, the health and ageing minister, called the new law "an example for the world to follow".

"Plain packaging means that the glamour is gone from smoking and cigarettes are now exposed for what they are: killer products that destroy thousands of Australian families," she said.

She said packaging is one of the last powerful marketing tools available to tobacco companies.

"Let there be no mistake, big tobacco is fighting against the government for one very simple reason – because it knows, as we do, that plain packaging will work," Ms Roxon said.

Source: Daily Telegraph (21 November 2011)

Comments:

Richard
Posted on
All a bit late from Philip Morris i`m afraid. They should have challenged the junk science about passive smoking years ago. Ive read so many interesting articles by eminent people concerning the fact that there`s no proof whatsoever that passive smoking even exists.

I`ll never understand why these tobacco giants didn`t challenge the health fanatics in the courts years ago, it was this passive smoking hysteria that got us into this mess in the first place.

Only the tobacco companies will know why they didn`t challenge it. Perhaps it was the fact that people would still smoke regardless of the ban, so no dent in there profits.

Now with a possible dent in there profits, they are taking action. I`ve no sympathy with Philip Morris at all, they seem to be acting for themselves as opposed the smoker.
Kaylyn
Posted on
A provocative iinshgt! Just what we need!
Leave a Reply



(Your email will not be publicly displayed.)

Please type the letters and numbers shown in the image.Captcha Code


Back to top

Recent posts

Share this page

Social Forest

Join the conversation online:



Friends of Forest