Chancellor criticised for increasing tobacco duty
Wednesday 23rd March 2011, posted by admin
Simon Clark, director of Forest, has criticised the Chancellor’s decision to increase tobacco duty by two per cent above inflation, arguing that it penalises "law-abiding consumers".
Clark said: "Law-abiding consumers who buy their tobacco in British shops are being penalised unfairly.
"The policy also discriminates against those who can least afford it, especially the elderly and the low paid.
"Increasing tobacco duty could cost the government billions of pounds. The people who will benefit most are black marketeers and those who purchase their tobacco abroad."
He added: "The Chancellor said the government's policy on tobacco will reduce smoking. It's not the government's role to force people to stop consuming a legal product. That's social engineering, which we deplore."
Comments:
ian grainger
Posted on
Mar 31st, 2011
our TESCOS put up tobacco about 12%.
imon
Posted on
Mar 31st, 2011
Can anyone think of another minority group that was discriminated against with full government approval in our history? I was talking about this with some friends the other night and none of us could think of another example. Someone said homosexuals were similarly discriminated against 100 years ago but we wrote that off as homosexuality was illegal then. Same with elderly women accused of being witches in the 1500's, but being a witch was also illegal back then.
The sort of government endorsed bigotry we are presently seeing seems to be a very rare thing in this country. I'd be interested to know if anyone can think of an example.
Upset
Posted on
Apr 1st, 2011
I think it's morally outrageous to keep putting prices up. I took up a legal habit and always avoided illicit drugs. Unfortunately due to emotional and personal problems I quickly became addicted. I realise some smokers have some control but I do not. Now after years of trying to work and going without a life I was made redundant due to various health problems and live on benefits. I cannot afford to smoke but am unable to quit so I have to go without food and heat but still may lose the home I worked so hard to afford. I feel I would be better off if I had taken up cocaine or heroin or even been an alcoholic (at least then I would have got special offers and reward points!). I feel I am a drug addict but cannot bring myself to resort to theft or prostitution to pay for my habit. This outrage is on top of ruining social lives by banning cigarettes in pubs and airports etc (though I can see the advantage for non-smokers and people trying to give up).
I would be interested to know what the statistics are regarding the myth that putting prices up reduces smoking. I have only ever know one person who has given up because of the price. Most people give up because of health and social problems. On the other hand how many people have suffered from price increases - financially and from worry about how to pay for them? How many smokers are there left in this country? Can't we join forces and do something?
forest
Posted on
Apr 2nd, 2011
could anyone tell me why MORRISONS supermarket has increased price of cigs by 10% plus my wife is very upset . She rang consumer advice they said there was no limit on price they can charge. She is looking for another supermarket.
pat
Posted on
Mar 22nd, 2012
I am so sick of this bleeding horrible greedy country i would say go get your fags from any means you can. If you are offered knocked off ones then buy them. If you can find a black market seller purchase from them go abroad do what it takes not to pay this Bleeding greedy government anymore of your money.
Back to top