News & Comment
Imperial criticises DoH report on tobacco
Saturday 2nd July 2011, posted by forest
An academic review of the smoking ban commissioned by the Department of Health (DoH) earlier this year has been criticised as “narrow and selective” by Imperial Tobacco.
The government published its Tobacco Control Plan for England in March 2011. which set out plans to “support efforts to reduce tobacco use over the next five years”.
Published alongside the plan was a report by Professor Linda Bauld, which was commissioned by the DoH to provide a review of the smokefree legislation implemented in England in 2007.However, a spokesman for Imperial Tobacco claims that
Bauld’s “clear vested interests and links to Government funded anti-tobacco lobby groups call the neutrality of the review into question.”
Imperial Tobacco’s senior UK corporate & legal affairs manager, Colin Wragg, said: “Along with many others directly affected by the legislation, Imperial Tobacco expected that such a review would be founded on substantive and broadly based evidence, ideally obtained from a number of different sources.“
Instead we find Linda Bauld’s review to be narrow and selective, ignoring much of the evidence base and failing to acknowledge anything that does not support her position.”
Wragg expressed concern at Bauld’s conclusions that the smoking ban has had “no clear adverse impact on the hospitality industry”, and that the “legislation has the potential to change social norms around smoking and results in changes in smoking behaviour”.
He added: “Imperial Tobacco has put together a comprehensive critique of Linda Bauld’s report which presents a number of different pieces of evidence from sources in the public domain that Professor Bauld chose not to consider. Had she done so, the conclusions of her review may have been different.”
Source: Morning Advertiser (1 July 2011)
Comments:
Posted on Jul 4th, 2011
This from Imperial Tobacco!
I'm unsure what Professor Bauld/s "vested interests" are, but could it be that IT's is something known as "profit"?
Posted on Jul 4th, 2011
"I am a social policy academic, as you know, and much of our research is government funded or funded by charities, or indeed funded by government through the research councils. The university receives these funds, not the academics. This is how university research funding works across the country and indeed in other countries."
So, if she keeps making her employer money through research funding, she continues to be employed. It's the same profit motive of which you speak. Exactly the same as those working for Imperial Tobacco who produced the report above.
In an ideal world, they'd all meet up and compare notes. ;)
Posted on Jul 4th, 2011
http://www.liberal-vision.org/2011/06/22/ash-abuse-of-public-money-must-end/comment-page-1/#comment-29704
