Campaigners urge MPs to reject “divisive” tobacco ban
reject ban to stop smoking

Campaigners have urged MPs to reject plans to ban the sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products to future generations of adults.

Ahead of the second reading of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill on Tuesday (November 26), the smokers’ rights group Forest says the proposal is “unnecessarily divisive” and does not have public support.

According to a recent poll commissioned by Forest and conducted by Yonder Consulting, 60% of respondents said that if people are allowed to drive a car, join the army, purchase alcohol, and vote at 18, they should also be allowed to buy cigarettes and other tobacco products.

Fewer than a third (31%) said they should not be allowed to purchase tobacco when legally an adult, while 9% said ‘don’t know’.

Simon Clark, director of Forest, said:

“A generational ban on the sale of tobacco is unnecessarily divisive because it will create a two-tier society in which some adults have different rights to others.

“Eventually it will create the absurd situation whereby a 40-year-old can purchase cigarettes and other tobacco products, but someone born a few days later could be denied the same right.”

He added:

“MPs need to think very carefully about the unintended consequences of raising the legal age of sale of tobacco.

“Denying future generations of adults the right to buy cigarettes and other tobacco products legally won’t stop people smoking.

“Creeping prohibition will simply drive the sale of tobacco underground and into the hands of criminal gangs and illicit traders.”

Simon Clark

Mission & Vision

N

Mission

Forest’s mission is to protect the interests of adults who choose to smoke or consume tobacco.

N

Our key aims and objectives are to:

  • counteract the “denormalisation” of smoking, and smokers
  • prevent further restrictions on the purchase and consumption of tobacco
  • establish closer links with other tobacco-friendly groups at home and abroad
  • build support among consumers of tobacco and other similarly threatened groups
  • highlight the increasingly intrusive nature of Big Government in the lives of private individuals